Apparently, scientists recently found yeast in and around Ötzi the Iceman, a 5,300-year-old mummy, and used it to make sourdough bread. This is the kind of news story that makes me look at my wife’s sourdough starter differently. I used to think it was just flour and water in a jar. Now I’m wondering if it is an ancient life form, a kitchen pet, or possibly a future archeological discovery.

My wife has entered the sourdough phase of life. For those who have not experienced this, sourdough is not simply “making bread.” It is more like adopting a tiny bubbling creature that lives on your counter, needs regular feeding, reacts to the weather, has moods, and somehow becomes the emotional center of the household.

It must be fed. It must be watched. It must not be neglected. It rises. It falls. It smells mysterious. It has good days and bad days. In other words, it is basically another child, except this one occasionally turns into pancakes.

And like any proud parent, my wife is now handing out pieces of the starter to anyone within range. Friends, neighbors, relatives, delivery drivers — no one is safe. It is not so much “Would you like some starter?” as it is “Congratulations, you are now responsible for keeping this alive.”

The science, though, is genuinely fascinating. A sourdough starter is a living culture of wild yeast and lactic acid bacteria. The yeast helps dough rise, while the bacteria produce acids that give sourdough its tangy flavor and affect the texture, shelf life, and digestibility of the bread. Sourdough traditionally develops through wild yeast from the environment and fermentation over time, which is why it differs from standard yeasted bread.

This is also why sourdough feels so old-fashioned and so futuristic at the same time. It is ancient food technology. Before commercial yeast packets, before bread machines, before “gut health” became a marketing slogan, people were using fermentation to make grains more flavorful, more useful, and easier to work with. Now scientists are baking with yeast from a mummy, which proves that sourdough has officially crossed from “homestead hobby” into “Indiana Jones meets The Great British Bake Off.” Researchers baked bread using cold-adapted yeast found on Ötzi’s body and described him not as a static relic, but as a dynamic biological system.

Health-wise, sourdough may be easier for some people to digest than ordinary white bread, and fermentation can influence starch digestion, FODMAPs, protein digestibility, and mineral availability. The fermentation process may also reduce some gluten.

The trend makes sense, though. People are tired of ultra-processed food and are drawn to things that feel slower, simpler, handmade, and connected to tradition. Sourdough has all the right modern buzzwords: fermented, artisan, gut-friendly, clean-label, ancestral, rustic, authentic. It is basically the farmhouse table of carbohydrates.

Of course, the trend has also gone a little wild. We are no longer content with sourdough bread. Now there are sourdough crackers, sourdough bagels, sourdough pizza crust, sourdough cinnamon rolls, sourdough pancakes, sourdough discard recipes, sourdough everything. At this rate, someone will soon release sourdough toothpaste and claim it supports oral microbiome resilience with notes of toasted wheat and mild regret.

Still, I have to admit there is something beautiful about it. In a rushed world, sourdough refuses to be rushed. It demands patience. It rewards attention. It teaches that good things often grow slowly, quietly, and with regular care. It reminds us that our homes are not sterile machines; they are living places full of invisible activity, shared meals, and small acts of stewardship.

So yes, my wife’s starter may be another child. It may need feeding. It may take up counter space. It may multiply and be distributed like edible chain mail. But it also gives us warm bread, a good laugh, and a reminder that life is always fermenting around us.

And frankly, if scientists can make bread from a 5,300-year-old mummy, then I suppose I can keep feeding the jar on the counter.

But I am not paying for its college.

Thank you for reading and sharing a laugh with me. Your support here helps sustain the work of Shield Bearer Counseling Centers, where we help individuals, couples, and families find hope and healing, and it also supports my work at Grow

Grit and Virtue, where I write and teach about faith, character, resilience, and the good life.

Donate to Shield Bearer

I’m grateful you’re here. Thank you for subscribing, sharing, and giving as you’re able.

Share Grow Grit & Virtue (In Pursuit of God)

Share

Subscribe now

Some Bible stories are hard to read because they seem to stand at the edge of everything we expect salvation to mean. Second Kings 9 is one of them.

This chapter is full of oil, blood, horses, politics, fear, pride, and judgment. There is no easy way to make this chapter pretty. Once Jehu is anointed king, the story quickly accelerates toward terrible judgment. Joram is killed, Ahaziah is hunted down, and Jezebel, still proud and defiant at the end, is thrown from a window. By the time the chapter closes, the dogs have eaten what remains of her body, just as Elijah had warned years before.

This is not the kind of story most of us choose for morning devotion.

But we need stories like this because they tell the truth about sin. Sin is not a private mistake we can keep tucked away in one hidden corner of life. Given enough time, it grows roots and reaches into everything around it. It enters families, shapes leaders, wounds children, and slowly changes the culture of a home, a church, a business, or even a nation. When people keep choosing evil, it never stays where they first put it. It spreads.

That is part of what Second Kings is showing us.

The books of Kings are not just giving us a list of old rulers. They tell Israel’s story with God at the center. Again and again, kings rise and fall. Some listen to God; many do not. Some protect the people; many use the people. Some honor the covenant; many turn to idols, power, pride, and self-protection.

We do not have to look far to see the same pattern in society today. Enron looked like genius until the fraud was exposed. FTX looked like the future until customers learned their money had been misused. The opioid crisis showed how corporate ambition can invade family life, medical care, addiction, jail cells, and funeral homes. The Panama Papers showed how secret accounts and hidden systems can protect wealth while ordinary people bear the weight of corruption. These stories remind us that evil rarely stays private. It builds structures. It recruits helpers. It learns to manipulate and play the public. Then, sooner or later, the truth begins to emerge.

By the time we reach Second Kings 9, the house of Ahab has become a picture of what happens when power is cut loose from God.

Share Grow Grit & Virtue (In Pursuit of God)

Read more

Esther is a young Jewish woman living in the Persian Empire, far from the land of her people, hidden behind royal walls, carrying a secret. Most people around her do not know who she really is. She has beauty, position, and access to the king, but she does not have safety in the way we might imagine. In that world, even a queen could not simply walk into the king’s presence. To approach him without being called could mean death.

Courage is not the absence of fear.

Then the news reaches her. Haman, a proud and powerful official, has convinced the king to approve a law that will destroy the Jewish people. Mordecai, Esther’s older cousin and guardian, sends word to her: she must go to the king and plead for her people. But Esther knows the danger. If she stays silent, she may survive for a while. If she speaks, she may die before she ever gets the chance to explain.

Esther must choose between self-protection and sacrificial love. She is trapped between fear and duty, between the instinct to hide and the call to stand in the gap for others. Mordecai tells her that perhaps she has come to the kingdom “for such a time as this.” Esther does not immediately respond with confidence. She asks her people to fast. She prepares her soul. Then she decides to act.

Share

Subscribe now

Read more

Marriages rarely fail because two people wake up one morning and decide to stop loving each other. More often, they weaken because of a persistent, quiet promise to tend to the relationship later. We will talk after this busy season. We will reconnect once the kids are older. We will go out when the finances stabilize. We will pray together when things finally calm down. We postpone the hurt until after the next deadline, the next payroll cycle, the next home repair, or the next crisis.

The trouble is that life seldom hands a couple a clean, quiet opening. It just keeps coming.

I know that world. I know the weight of carrying enormous professional responsibility—running a company, meeting payroll, and extinguishing fires no one else can touch—only to sit in an hour of traffic and arrive home drained. I know the transition to a household of five children, pets, and endless commitments: church events, homeschool co-ops, meal planning, aging parents, and the constant glare of unfinished chores. It is a world of countless responsibilities shouting for attention.

Somewhere in the middle of that noise is your spouse.

Read more

I wrote this for parents who are still raising children in the home. But even if you do not have children, or your children are grown and living their own lives, there is still something here for you. All of us have relationships where emotions run high, where someone we love becomes overwhelmed, defensive, angry, afraid, or hard to reach. And all of us have moments when our own reaction can either add fuel or sooth. We can all grow in patience, self-command, compassion, and wisdom in the way we respond to the people God has placed in our life.

Every parent eventually meets the version of their child who cannot be reasoned with.

My wife and I met one version of this early in our marriage, back when we had two small children and still believed eating in a restaurant with babies was a normal adult activity. We were trying to order food, trying to find something the kids would eat, trying to behave like people who could still participate in public life. Then the baby decided she was done. Not mildly done. Not “I need a cracker” done. Completely done.

She screamed. She fussed. She had no words, no explanation, no interest in our plans, and no respect for the ambiance. We were still trying to decide what to do. Should one of us take her outside? Should we ask for the food to go? Could we calm her down? Before we could even work through the options, a nearby table complained. I understood why. Nobody goes to a restaurant hoping to listen to a baby come apart. But I also remember feeling the heat rise in me. Give us a minute. We are trying. She is a baby, not a tiny criminal mastermind. We are embarrassed too.

That is one kind of crisis: public, loud, humiliating, and out of your control.

But in our house, with five children, crisis has also had more domestic forms. Four of our five are daughters, and right now the girls range from nine to twenty-two. They share two bedrooms, one bathroom, closets that were not designed by anyone who understood female clothing, and a family ecosystem filled with dresses, shoes, makeup, brushes, hair ties, necklaces, and disputed property rights. Someone grew out of a dress but still considers it emotionally hers. Someone borrowed makeup without asking. Someone is wearing shoes that apparently belong to another sister. Someone took a necklace because, as the reasoning goes, “She took my thing last week.”

Read more

I wrote this especially for parents, but if you do not have children, or if your children are grown and no longer under your roof, there is still something here worth considering. Every home, workplace, church, and community has some version of the sticky spot on the stairs: a problem everybody notices, names, complains about, and steps around. This reflection is about chores, but it is also about responsibility, belonging, service, and the ordinary work of love. We can all grow in the habit of seeing what needs doing, taking responsibility for what is ours to do, and helping build the kind of home or community where people do not simply receive care, but learn to give it.

Most children do not naturally wake up in the morning and think, Today I would like to contribute meaningfully to the order and beauty of this household.

They do not usually gaze upon a full trash can and feel a stirring sense of civic duty. They do not see a pile of laundry and whisper, “At last, my moment has come.” They do not walk past crumbs, socks, cups, wrappers, backpacks, shoes, and the mysterious sticky spot on the counter with the moral clarity of a responsible adult.

They are children.

Which means they often see mess as scenery. They step over it, live beside it, and occasionally add to it with creative confidence.

Just recently, I was reminded of this on a Sunday morning before church. I am usually the first one ready, which sounds more virtuous than it is because I also know the safest place for a father of five on a Sunday morning is sometimes a chair in the living room. From there, I watched and listened as the rest of the house came alive: five children, ages nine to twenty-three, four girls and one boy, moving through various stages of preparation. Someone was looking for clothes. Someone needed undergarments. Someone could not find shoes. Someone needed the bathroom mirror. Someone needed access to a hairbrush, a toothbrush, the laundry room, all while I prayed for divine intervention.

At different points, they went up and down the stairs, checking the washer, checking the dryer, hunting for whatever essential article of clothing had not yet completed its journey from damp to wearable. And one by one, each of them announced that there was something wet, sticky, and slippery on the stairs. They did not use the same words, but they all delivered the report with the same urgent tone: there is a problem here, and this problem is clearly worth broadcasting.

What none of them did was stop and clean it up.

They simply reported it as they passed, as if our staircase had been equipped with a voice-activated maintenance system. Perhaps they imagined a small microphone hidden in the banister would send the alert to a satellite, which would then notify a vendor, who would dispatch a cleanup crew before the next child came down looking for a shoe. But no such crew arrived. The announcement was made. The problem remained.

That is the difference chores are meant to teach. A child has not fully learned responsibility when he can notice the mess, name the mess, complain about the mess, and step around the mess. Responsibility begins when he understands, I live here too. If I see something that needs doing, I can help do it.

Chores matter.

Read more

Read more

I wrote this especially for parents who are still raising children at home. But even if you do not have children, or your children are grown and making their own decisions now, there is still something here for you. Every human relationship involves the mystery of freedom. We cannot force another person to become wise, faithful, responsible, or loving. We can guide, encourage, correct, pray, and offer counsel, but we cannot choose for them. This reflection is about helping children make choices, but it is also about learning how to love others without controlling them, how to give guidance without manipulation, and how to respect freedom while still standing for what is good.

My dad used to love telling a story from when I was a baby or toddler, right around the age when I was learning to talk. I had been put to bed in my crib, and he was walking down the hallway past my room, assuming I was asleep. Then he heard a sound.

Not crying. Not calling for him. Not asking for water.

Just a small voice in the dark practicing one word over and over again: “No.”

He stopped outside the door and leaned in. The door was barely cracked, just enough for him to see me in the crib, apparently wide awake and conducting private rehearsals. “No,” I said. Then again with a different tone. “No.” Then a little firmer. “No.” Then maybe sweeter, maybe sharper, maybe with the authority of a tiny person preparing for future negotiations with the household.

He would laugh every time he told it, because he knew exactly what he had overheard. I was not just learning a word. I was getting familiar with a tool. I was trying it on, testing the weight of it, preparing for the day when I would be released from the crib and back among the people who would soon be asking me unreasonable things like whether I wanted food, clothes, a bath, or sleep.

Every parent eventually witnesses some version of that discovery. Before that, the child was demanding, of course. Babies are not exactly known for their patience. Toddlers can communicate displeasure with astonishing emotional range. But once a child discovers that tiny little word, something new begins. “No” becomes a flag planted in the carpet. No to shoes. No to pajamas. No to broccoli. No to leaving the park. No to the cup they asked for eleven seconds ago. No to the thing that was their favorite thing yesterday.

Parents often experience this as rebellion. Sometimes it is. But often it is something more basic and more important: the child is discovering agency.

We don’t interpret this agency to mean the child should run the house. A three-year-old should not be in charge of bedtime, nutrition, safety, screen time, or whether the family goes to church, school, work, or the dentist. Children need authority. They need limits. They need parents who are calm enough and strong enough to lead.

But children also need to learn how to choose.

Share

Read more

While I wrote this series especially for parents still raising children at home, it still has something to offer to those who do not have children, or do have children who happen to be grown and no longer under your roof. Every relationship depends on whether our words can be trusted, whether our promises mean anything, whether our emotions rewrite our commitments, and whether people experience us as reliable or unpredictable. This reflection is about parenting, but it is also about becoming the kind of person whose words mean something, whose love can be counted on, and whose daily habits give others something solid to trust.

Adult life is exhausting before parenting ever enters the picture. There are bills to pay, jobs to manage, meals to plan, messages to answer, appointments to remember, people who need us, and a hundred small responsibilities that suck the wind from our sails. Then children step into that already crowded life with their own needs, emotions, messes, questions, conflicts, and unfinished chores.

Most parents do not lose consistency because they do not care. They lose it because they are worn down. They care deeply, but caring does not erase fatigue. A parent can love a child with his whole heart and still feel too tired to enforce the rules, too overwhelmed to have the same conversation again, or too depleted to follow through when the easier path is to give in and get five minutes of peace.

They lose it in the morning when the child who was told to put on shoes is instead lying on the floor making airplane noises into the carpet. They lose it after work when the backpack is dumped by the door again, the lunchbox smells like rotten food, and the chore that was supposed to be done before dinner is sitting there untouched. They lose it at bedtime when the same child who could not hear a single instruction all evening suddenly becomes deeply interested in theology, hydration, monsters, bathroom needs, and whether penguins have knees.

Parents start the day with standards. They end the day negotiating with terrorists in dinosaur pajamas.

It reminds me of the expectation-versus-reality parenting clips that make the rounds online. The first scene is the parent we imagined we would be: part Mary Poppins, part Sound of Music, all patience, singing, wisdom, and gentle correction. Then the clip cuts to reality, and suddenly the parent looks less like Julie Andrews on a hillside and more like Judge Judy yelling at a defendant in her courtroom. It’s funny because it’s uncomfortably close to true. Most of us begin with a lovely inner portrait of the parent we want to be. Then dinner runs late, the homework vanishes, someone is crying, someone is lying, someone is touching someone else with one toe from across the couch, and the gap between our ideal self and our actual tone becomes painfully obvious.

Read more

I wrote this especially for parents still raising children at home. But if you do not have children, or if your children are grown and no longer under your roof, consequences still have something to teach. Every life has choices, and every choice carries weight. We all need to grow in the wisdom to connect actions with reality, to repair what we damage, to take responsibility, and to help others do the same. This reflection is about parenting, but it is also about making choices and accepting consequences. Adulting requires both.

Most parents have said something in the heat of the moment they later regretted.

“You are grounded for the rest of your life.”

“No screens for a month.”

“If you do that one more time, I am throwing every toy in this house into the trash.”

I wish I could write about this as a parent who has always handled consequences calmly and wisely. I cannot. I am embarrassed by how many times I have reached for a consequence that was bigger than the moment required. At the time, it feels reasonable. The child has ignored the chore, talked back, lied about homework, left a mess, broken a rule, or treated a sibling or a parent with unacceptable disrespect. The parent is tired. Dinner is half-cooked. The dog is barking. Somebody is crying. So the parent reaches for the biggest consequence available and launches it across the room like a flare.

Then ten minutes later, reality arrives.

A month without screens means the parent has also grounded himself. Throwing every toy away is neither practical nor sane. The lifelong grounding is legally difficult to enforce. And now the parent has a new problem: either follow through on something unreasonable or back down and teach the child that parental words are mostly arbitrary and will pass without much todo.

This is why consequences matter.

Good consequences are not about revenge or a better way to make children suffer. That is not discipline. They are about formation. They help a child learn that actions matter, choices have weight, trust can be damaged, responsibility belongs to someone, and repair is part of growing up.

A good consequence does not just ask, “How do I stop this behavior right now?” It asks a deeper question: “What does this child need to learn?”

Read more

I wrote this especially for parents still raising children at home. But if you do not have children, or if your children are grown and no longer under your roof, communication still has plenty to teach. All of us have relationships where our tone matters, where our words can heal or bruise, where listening is hard, and where we are tempted to defend ourselves before we understand the other person. This reflection is about parenting, but it is also about becoming someone who listens intently, speaks carefully, and creates enough trust for hard things to be brought into the open.

Years ago, my son got a handheld voice recorder, and for a while it became one of the most entertaining objects in our house. He recorded jokes, little radio plays with his sisters, guided tours around our home and property as if he were a real estate agent, silly instructional recordings, prank announcements, and random family moments that none of us knew were being preserved for future evidence.

Most of it was hilarious. We would sit around listening to those recordings and laugh at the voices, the sound effects, the improvised drama, and the accidental moments nobody could have planned. But every once in a while, the recorder caught something else. A parental tone. A sharp answer from another room. A loud overly harsh correction. A sentence that sounded different when played back than it had sounded in the moment.

Recordings do not lie. They do not soften the edge in your voice or explain how tired you were. They simply play back what was said and how it sounded.

It’s a strange feeling of hearing your own voice come out of your mouth and thinking, I sound exactly like my mother. Or father.

Most parents know that uncomfortable realization, whether it comes through a recording or through the sudden awareness of hearing their own voice in the middle of a hard moment. One child leaves the trash untouched after being reminded three times. Another child forgets homework again. A teenager comes home with a story that does not quite add up. The parent starts calm, or at least intends to start calm, and then suddenly the volume rises, the words sharpen, and a simple conversation becomes a tangle of half-details, accusations, assumptions, emotional side trails, and missing pieces.

Communication is not about having more words. Most parents already have plenty of words, and many of those words come out as lectures. A lecture is not just a long explanation. It is a verbal flood: correction, warning, history lesson, moral lesson, prediction of future disaster, and review of every related failure from the last six months. Parents usually lecture because we are trying to make the child understand. We want the lesson to land. We want the mistake to matter. We want to feel like we have done our job.

But we also need to ask an honest question: are we lecturing for the child, or are we lecturing for ourselves? Sometimes the lecture gives the parent a place to put fear, embarrassment, frustration, and helplessness. It lets us feel like we are doing something. But the child often hears something very different. They hear criticism. They hear, again, how they failed. Their brain starts looking for escape instead of understanding. Their emotions rise, their ears close, and the lesson we hoped to teach gets buried under the weight of all our words.

The harder skill is learning how to speak in a way our children can actually receive.

Read more

The most dangerous lies we encounter come wrapped in truth. Take the phrase be true to yourself. At one level, it points toward something real. A person should not live as a fraud. But once that counsel is untethered from truth, character, and reality outside the self, it becomes a license to baptize impulse as authenticity. That is how many dangerous ideas work. They begin with something real, then stretch it until it becomes false.

The modern fantasy that a person can author himself from scratch is one of the most persuasive lies of our age.

That lie did not appear overnight. It has been working on us for nearly a century. In the long shadow of the Great Depression, when economic collapse had rattled the country and millions of Americans were trying to find a way back to security, confidence, and a sense of worth, the culture learned to speak a new moral language of self-invention, personal magnetism, and success through inner mastery. Dale Carnegie told ordinary people they could learn to “win friends and influence people.” Napoleon Hill promised they could “think and grow rich.” The implication ran deeper than a call to hard work and responsibility. It was that the right techniques, mindset, and presentation could refashion a life from the inside out.

A few decades later, the human potential movement preached that beneath your ordinary life lay buried greatness waiting to be released. At places like Esalen, people flocked to encounter groups, bodywork, consciousness workshops, and weekend seminars built around the idea that the self could be unlocked, expanded, optimized, and transformed. Then came the mass-market gurus, the productivity prophets, the daytime therapists, the empowerment industry, the conference circuits, the makeover shows, and the vision boards. Rows of books on leadership, influence, habits, communication, mindset, productivity, vision, and success lined airport bookstores and Barnes and Noble. Stephen Covey gave us a system of habits and Tony Robbins filled stadiums while Oprah took it straight to our family rooms with the language of becoming your best self and living your best life. The internet took all of it and metastasized it. What had once been preached in books, seminars, and television was now woven into feeds, metrics, followers, platforms, and income streams. The self was no longer just something to improve, it became something to package, display, monetize, and perpetually revise.

Read more

I wrote this especially for parents still raising children at home. But if you do not have children, or if your children are grown and making their own way now, there is still something here worth considering. All of us live with people whose behavior can be confusing, frustrating, immature, or hard to understand. And all of us have our own areas where growth is still under construction. This reflection is about child development, but it is also about learning to see people more carefully, respond with more patience, and ask better questions before assuming the worst. Sometimes what looks like stubbornness is fear. Sometimes what looks like laziness is disorganization. Sometimes what looks like defiance is an undeveloped skill that still needs practice, support, and time.

Most parents have had a moment when their child’s behavior made them feel embarrassed in public, confused in private, and quietly unsure whether they knew what they were doing at all: Why is my child acting like this?

It may happen in the grocery store when a four-year-old collapses over a denied box of cereal. It may happen at the kitchen table when an eight-year-old stares at a math worksheet as if it were written in ancient Greek. It may happen when a teenager responds to a simple question with a one-word answer that somehow manages to sound tired, annoyed, and offended all at once. The parent feels the heat rise in his chest and starts building the case in his mind: She is being disrespectful. He is being lazy. They know better. This is defiance.

Sometimes that is true. Children can be defiant. They can be selfish, rude, dishonest, impulsive, and stubborn. Any parent who has lived with children longer than eleven minutes knows this. Children are wonderful, but they are not naturally mature. They arrive in the world with strong wants, loud feelings, limited self-control, and a remarkable ability to believe the universe should reorganize itself around their preferences.

The behavior may need correction. But first it needs to be understood: Is this child being rebellious, or is this child acting like a child at this stage of development?

Share

Read more

While I wrote this especially for parents still raising children at home, even if you do not have children, or if your children are grown and no longer under your roof, there is still something here for you. Every relationship depends on trust. We are all tempted to correct before we connect, to speak before we listen, to fix before we understand, and to defend ourselves before we repair what we have damaged. This reflection is about parenting, but it is also about becoming the kind of person whose presence makes honesty, growth, and reconciliation more possible.

Parenting is hard. All parents know this.

They know it when one child cannot find a shoe and everyone is already late getting out the door, or when another child is crying because the blue cup is somehow superior to the green cup, or someone is yelling from the bathroom that there is no toilet paper. They know it in the grocery store when a tired child begins melting down in the cereal aisle because they want marshmallows. They know it at bedtime when everyone is exhausted, the house looks like a family of Tasmanian devils reside there, and the sweet little person they love with their whole heart suddenly develops the negotiating skills of a defense attorney.

Parenting is not easy.

Before we dive into the all-important question, “How do I get my child to behave?” Let’s go a bit deeper.

Of course, that question matters because children need discipline, correction, and limits; without clear boundaries, a home becomes confusing and chaotic very quickly.

But parenting is about more than managing behavior. Parenting is about forming a person. It is about helping a child grow into someone who can love, listen, work, forgive, speak truthfully, respect others, regulate emotions, take responsibility, and eventually live with wisdom when Mom and Dad are not standing there giving instructions.

That kind of parenting requires more than parenting techniques and overly simple behavior-management tactics.

These wear out and lose power. Bribing your children can get expensive and even more so as they age and old-fashioned threats have to keep escalating. Real parenting growth begins when mothers and fathers understand what they are building in the home and how daily patterns shape a child’s heart, habits, and sense of safety.

Read more

Modern therapy culture has grown far beyond the real work of counseling. It now operates as a way of making sense of right and wrong, a shared public language, and in many cases a substitute religion. It tells people what their pain means, who is to blame, what categories explain their life, and what kind of response counts as healing. That is a major shift. Therapy used to be understood as one limited tool for helping people with real emotional pain and suffering, distorted and troubled thinking, crippling patterns, and broken relationships. Now it is often treated as the default lens for interpreting ordinary life. The result is not simply more compassion or better help. The result is a culture that increasingly teaches people to understand themselves as wounded, fragile, and in need of ongoing professional help to explain their lives.

Therapy language now shapes far more than the counseling room. It shows up in dating shows, celebrity scandals, friendship rules, breakup scripts, and the way ordinary people explain themselves. In 2024 the APA noted that psychological terms now show up in reality TV, citing The Bachelor and Vanderpump Rules conversations about “emotional intelligence,” “boundaries,” and “narcissistic tendencies.” It shows up in celebrity controversies too. Jonah Hill’s leaked texts to Sarah Brady became a national argument about whether therapeutic language about “boundaries” was being used to describe self-limitation or to justify control. That example points to a clear instance of therapy language being pulled into ordinary relational conflict and used in ways that blur moral and psychological judgment, making it easier to see how clinical language gets imported into everyday life and misused. Even secular sources now recognize how far therapeutic culture has spread into support systems, relationships, politics, and popular culture, and how deeply it has changed the way people tell life stories and define a good life.

Share

Subscribe now

Read more

A man can stand in a bright church hallway with a paper cup of coffee in his hand, nod at six people, joke about the weather, ask about their kids, and still walk to his truck feeling like nobody touched the real thing. I have been that man more times than I care to count. My work puts me in rooms where I am supposed to connect, initiate, and build relationships for the sake of the organization I lead, and almost none of that comes naturally to me. I am a strong introvert. It takes me longer to enter a group. I often find myself at the edge of the room, trying to step in and wanting, at the same time, to disappear. He showed up. He smiled. He said the right words in the right order. But he stayed emotionally protected, where people could talk to him without ever getting close. That is the question under a lot of modern loneliness. What if loneliness has less to do with how many people stand near you and more to do with how much of yourself you keep hidden?

Loneliness is not a math problem. It is not about not enough friends, not enough texts, or not enough invitations. Sometimes that is true because social isolation does matter. It means a person has too few relationships, too little contact, and too little support. But loneliness runs deeper. Loneliness is the pain you feel when the relationships you have do not meet the level of closeness, truth, or belonging you actually need. Solitude differs from both. Solitude means chosen aloneness. Loneliness means you ache. You can feel lonely in a packed office, a full house, or a crowded party, because the wound does not start when no one is around. The wound starts when nobody knows you, or when you decide nobody will.

Social connection ranks as a basic human need, and its absence raises the risk of early death, heart disease, stroke, anxiety, depression, and dementia by 30 percent. One study found that social connection increased the odds of survival by 50 percent. Over 30 percent of adults reported loneliness in 2022, and among adults ages 18 to 34 the number rose to nearly 45 percent. Only 58 percent of teens say they receive the social and emotional support they need. That means two out of five kids already know what it feels like to stand in a room and wonder whether anyone would notice if they disappeared.

Subscribe now

Share

Share Grow Grit & Virtue (In Pursuit of God)

Read more

Self-discipline is the only path to true ordered freedom, because it is the way a person learns to choose what is actually good instead of being pushed around by chaos, appetite, mood, or impulse. But beginning that training is not the same thing as sustaining it. Once a person starts redirecting his inner life toward God, the real question becomes how that new order is maintained over time without collapsing into exhaustion, pressure, or self-reliance. That is where the will matters so much. The will is not a decorative voice in the soul, and it is not meant to sit quietly in the corner while stronger desires take over. It is meant to govern under God. And for that government to become steady and enduring, the Christian life depends on three sustaining helps: patience, prudence, and grace. Patience teaches us to endure the slow work of change. Prudence teaches us how to order daily life so obedience becomes more possible. Grace strengthens the will so discipline does not turn into a project of self-salvation. Without these, self-discipline falters. With them, the soul begins to grow into the kind of order that makes real freedom possible.

A lot of people live as if the strongest feeling in the room should get the final say.

If they feel tired, tired wins. If they feel angry, anger wins. If they feel lonely, loneliness wins. If they feel desire, desire wins. If they feel anxious, anxiety wins. If they feel bored, boredom wins. They may still say they believe in God. They may still want to be decent. They may still hate the mess they keep making. But when the moment comes, the loudest voice inside them takes over.

Then afterward they say, “I don’t know what happened,” even though, in one sense, they do know. They did not choose what was best. They obeyed what was loudest.

That is one of the clearest signs that the inner life is out of order.

By inner life I simply mean everything going on inside you: your thoughts, memories, feelings, cravings, fears, images, habits, impulses, and desires. Most people know what it feels like when that inner life is a mess. Part of them wants to pray, and another part wants to scroll. Part of them wants to forgive, and another part wants to punish. Part of them wants to be honest, and another part wants to hide. Part of them wants peace, and another part is feeding the very thing that destroys it.

This inner division is exhausting. It is one reason so many people feel weak, even when they are strong in other areas of life. They can manage projects, build careers, solve problems, and care for other people, yet still feel strangely unable to govern themselves. Their inner world feels like a room where too many people are shouting at once.

That is where the will comes in.

The will is the part of you that says yes or no. It is the power by which you choose. It is what moves you from wish to action. You may want ten different things at once, but the will is what finally leans in one direction and says, “This is what I am going to do.”

That is why your will should not be treated like a suggestion box.

Share Grow Grit & Virtue (In Pursuit of God)

Read more

So then, what does real change require? It requires more than stopping. It requires training. The next step is practical. In the last essays, we have been clearing up misconceptions. We have seen that the problem is not our humanity itself, and that growth does not come by trying to mutilate or amputate the powers God built into us. But even after that correction, many people still make the same practical mistake. They think self-discipline is mostly a matter of saying no. No to the urge, no to the habit, no to the appetite, no to the impulse. Sometimes that no is necessary. But human beings were not made to live on bare negation. When you take something away, you create a space, and that space has to be filled with something better. So the next step is not mere refusal. It is redirection. It is training the soul’s powers toward what is true, good, and life-giving.

A lot of people try to change by making war not just on the behaviors and temperaments they know need changing, but on themselves.

They get serious about sin, which is good. They get tired of the same failures, which is also good. They feel convicted. They want to stop living in circles. So they start saying no. No to the habit. No to the craving. No to the screen. No to the drink. No to the flirting. No to the outburst. No to the fantasy. No to the laziness. No to the comfort. No to the appetite.

That is not wrong. Sometimes the first faithful word a person needs to say is no.

But many people stop there.

They think if they just deny enough, cut enough, clamp down enough, they will become holy. They think the whole Christian life is one long tightening of the jaw. One long starvation of desire. One long campaign of subtraction. So they become people who are always trying to empty themselves without knowing what should fill the space.

And then they wonder why their spiritual life feels dry, flat, and exhausting.

It feels that way because human beings were not made to live on bare negation. The soul cannot thrive on “don’t” alone. A person can quit a habit and still not be healed. A person can stop one behavior and still be inwardly starving. A person can say no to sin and still never learn how to say yes to love, truth, worship, courage, patience, service, beauty, or joy.

That is why so many people relapse. They sweep the house but leave it empty.

Share

Subscribe now

Read more

We live in such a crooked and twisted age that truth gets negotiated, and even decent people begin to treat moral surrender as normal. Compromise to us rarely looks evil. It comes dressed as pressure, survival, ambition, fatigue, and the quiet logic that says a small betrayal of truth is simply the price of living in the world as it is.

Do you recall the stretch of time when Lance Armstrong was not merely famous but a national myth? Even though I’m not a cyclist I remember being enamored by the headlines. He was the hard-jawed cyclist in the yellow jersey, the cancer survivor who seemed to embody grit, defiance, and American resolve. He not only won races, he became a symbol people wanted to believe in. His bracelets were everywhere. His story sat in doctors’ offices, living rooms, locker rooms, and charity banquets. He looked like proof that suffering could be mastered, that discipline could become redemption, that a man could stare down death, rise, and carry a nation’s admiration on his back.

Then it came apart. The doping allegations, the sworn denials, the lawsuits, the stripped titles, the lifetime ban, the public collapse. But even then, what was most revealing was not only that he lied. It was how he thought about the lie. When he finally admitted what he had done, he still spoke as if the moral problem were negotiable, as if cheating inside a corrupted system did not really feel like cheating at all: “I didn’t view it that way. I viewed it as a level playing field.” That is relativism. A man so formed by compromise that reality itself had been bent to protect the lie. The truth was fixed. He doped. He deceived. He ruined reputations to protect the fiction. But relativism trains the conscience to treat truth as elastic, morality as environmental, and guilt as optional. We have seen the same logic elsewhere—in athletes who tell themselves everyone is doing it, in politicians who call cruelty strategy, in everyday people who rename dishonesty as survival or spin. Once truth becomes something to manage instead of something to obey, the soul does not merely make a mistake. It begins to lose its shape.

Subscribe now

Share

Read more

As we pursue self-discipline, many of us eventually run into the same wall. We begin to see that God made us for real fulfillment in Him, yet we keep getting pulled off course by our own inner leanings. We want to eat well, but we reach for what comforts us. We want to be generous, but our own wants feel urgent. We want to be patient, but anger rises faster than love. We want to live faithfully, but ambition, appetite, fear, and the need to be soothed keep pressing for control. And somewhere in that struggle, many people begin to draw the wrong conclusion. They start to believe the problem is not simply that their powers are disordered, but that those powers are evil in themselves. So instead of learning how desire, anger, ambition, and strength must be trained, redirected, and restored, they try to cut them off. But self-discipline is not a form of self-mutilation. It is not the demolition of your humanity. It is the patient restoration of it. If the last essay was about redefining the problem, this one is about correcting the mistaken solution.

There are many people who carry around a quiet hatred of themselves and mistake it for virtue.

They may never say it that way, but underneath their language is a deep suspicion that parts of them are bad all the way down. Their strong desires feel dirty. Their anger feels shameful. Their intensity feels dangerous. Their ambition feels selfish. Their imagination feels unreliable. Their need for affection feels weak. Their hunger for beauty feels foolish. Their drive feels embarrassing. So they begin to think the only way to become good is to cut away large parts of themselves. They want to remove their desire, emotion, intuition, or other parts that make them human and who God made them to be. As a result, they become smaller. Quieter. Flatter. Less alive.

But it is often a tragic mistake.

A man may think, “If I struggle with lust, then desire itself must be bad.” A woman may think, “If my anger has hurt people, then anger itself must be bad.” A gifted leader may think, “If ambition has made me proud, then I should stop wanting anything.” A sensitive person may think, “If my emotions keep getting me into trouble, then feeling deeply must be the problem.” A strong-willed child may grow into an adult who thinks, “The real issue is that there is just too much of me.”

But the Gospel is not trying to turn you into a ghost.

It is trying to make you whole.

Share Grow Grit & Virtue (In Pursuit of God)

Subscribe now

Read more